14-12-2021 18:54 - edited 14-12-2021 19:02
For around 2 months I’ve had unplayable gameplay due to packet loss and ping spikes.
I’ve had 3 engineers round in a couple of weeks and a router change to potentially cure it and it still has not. It’s totally unacceptable and I’m fed up now.
I’ve been running a BQM the last couple of days please see below
Channel Frequency (Hz) Power (dBmV) SNR (dB) Modulation Channel ID
25 | 331000000 | 2.4 | 38.6 | QAM256 | 25 |
32 | 387000000 | 1.8 | 38.6 | QAM256 | 32 |
33 | 491000000 | 0.2 | 38.6 | QAM256 | 33 |
34 | 499000000 | 0.3 | 37.6 | QAM256 | 34 |
35 | 507000000 | 0.2 | 38.6 | QAM256 | 35 |
36 | 515000000 | 0.1 | 38.6 | QAM256 | 36 |
6 | 179000000 | 4.2 | 39 | QAM256 | 6 |
7 | 187000000 | 4.3 | 39 | QAM256 | 7 |
8 | 195000000 | 4.2 | 39 | QAM256 | 8 |
9 | 203000000 | 4.2 | 38.6 | QAM256 | 9 |
10 | 211000000 | 4 | 39 | QAM256 | 10 |
11 | 219000000 | 4.2 | 39 | QAM256 | 11 |
12 | 227000000 | 4.2 | 39 | QAM256 | 12 |
13 | 235000000 | 4 | 39 | QAM256 | 13 |
14 | 243000000 | 4 | 39 | QAM256 | 14 |
15 | 251000000 | 4 | 39 | QAM256 | 15 |
16 | 259000000 | 3.6 | 39 | QAM256 | 16 |
17 | 267000000 | 3.6 | 39 | QAM256 | 17 |
18 | 275000000 | 3.5 | 38.6 | QAM256 | 18 |
19 | 283000000 | 3.8 | 38.6 | QAM256 | 19 |
20 | 291000000 | 4 | 39 | QAM256 | 20 |
21 | 299000000 | 3.7 | 39 | QAM256 | 21 |
22 | 307000000 | 3.2 | 38.6 | QAM256 | 22 |
23 | 315000000 | 2.8 | 38.6 | QAM256 | 23 |
24 | 323000000 | 2.7 | 38.6 | QAM256 | 24 |
26 | 339000000 | 2.2 | 38.6 | QAM256 | 26 |
27 | 347000000 | 2.2 | 38.6 | QAM256 | 27 |
28 | 355000000 | 2.3 | 39 | QAM256 | 28 |
29 | 363000000 | 2.2 | 38.6 | QAM256 | 29 |
30 | 371000000 | 2.2 | 38.6 | QAM256 | 30 |
31 | 379000000 | 2.1 | 38.6 | QAM256 | 31 |
Channel Lock Status RxMER (dB) Pre RS Errors Post RS Errors
25 | Locked | 38.605377 | 0 | 0 |
32 | Locked | 38.605377 | 0 | 0 |
33 | Locked | 38.605377 | 0 | 0 |
34 | Locked | 37.636276 | 0 | 0 |
35 | Locked | 38.605377 | 0 | 0 |
36 | Locked | 38.605377 | 0 | 0 |
6 | Locked | 38.983261 | 0 | 0 |
7 | Locked | 38.983261 | 0 | 0 |
8 | Locked | 38.983261 | 0 | 0 |
9 | Locked | 38.605377 | 0 | 0 |
10 | Locked | 38.983261 | 0 | 0 |
11 | Locked | 38.983261 | 0 | 0 |
12 | Locked | 38.983261 | 0 | 0 |
13 | Locked | 38.983261 | 0 | 0 |
14 | Locked | 38.983261 | 0 | 0 |
15 | Locked | 38.983261 | 0 | 0 |
16 | Locked | 38.983261 | 0 | 0 |
17 | Locked | 38.983261 | 0 | 0 |
18 | Locked | 38.605377 | 0 | 0 |
19 | Locked | 38.605377 | 0 | 0 |
20 | Locked | 38.983261 | 0 | 0 |
21 | Locked | 38.983261 | 0 | 0 |
22 | Locked | 38.605377 | 0 | 0 |
23 | Locked | 38.605377 | 0 | 0 |
24 | Locked | 38.605377 | 0 | 0 |
26 | Locked | 38.605377 | 0 | 0 |
27 | Locked | 38.605377 | 0 | 0 |
28 | Locked | 38.983261 | 0 | 0 |
29 | Locked | 38.605377 | 0 | 0 |
30 | Locked | 38.605377 | 0 | 0 |
31 | Locked | 38.605377 | 0 | 0 |
159 | 96 | 4K | 1880 | QAM4096 | 392 |
159 | Locked | 41 | 1.3 | 50801359 | 0 |
on 15-12-2021 10:00
You need to post the Upstream levels as well. Network log is also missing?
The Downstream looks okay, but the BQM is a tad noisy, and shows some signs of over utilisation during peak evening hours.
I'm a Very Insightful Person, I'm here to share knowledge, I don't work for Virgin Media. Learn more
Have I helped? Click Mark as Helpful Answer or use Kudos to say thanks
on 15-12-2021 10:09
Todays graph not in peak hours too
Channel Frequency (Hz) Power (dBmV) Symbol Rate (ksps) Modulation Channel ID
1 | 25800000 | 40 | 5120 KSym/sec | 64QAM | 4 |
2 | 32600000 | 40.3 | 5120 KSym/sec | 64QAM | 3 |
3 | 39400000 | 41.3 | 5120 KSym/sec | 64QAM | 2 |
4 | 46200000 | 42.3 | 5120 KSym/sec | 64QAM | 1 |
Channel Channel Type T1 Timeouts T2 Timeouts T3 Timeouts T4 Timeouts
1 | US_TYPE_STDMA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2 | US_TYPE_STDMA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3 | US_TYPE_STDMA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
4 | US_TYPE_STDMA | 0 | 0 | 0
|
17:17:443Received Response to Broadcast Maintenance Request, But no Unicast Maintenance opportunities received - T4 time out;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1;Wed 01/12/2021 17:19:145MIMO Event MIMO: Stored MIMO=-1 post cfg file MIMO=-1;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1;Wed 01/12/2021 17:31:305DBC-REQ Mismatch Between Calculated Value for P1.6hi Compared to CCAP Provided Value;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1;Thu 02/12/2021 18:38:033No Ranging Response received - T3 time-out;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1;Sun 05/12/2021 04:52:434DHCP RENEW WARNING - Field invalid in response v4 option;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1;Sun 05/12/2021 04:52:446DHCP Renew - lease parameters tftp file-cmreg-vmdg640-bbt062+voc-b.cm modified;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1;Mon 06/12/2021 19:00:073No Ranging Response received - T3 time-out;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1;Wed 08/12/2021 16:52:444DHCP RENEW WARNING - Field invalid in response v4 option;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1;Wed 08/12/2021 16:52:446DHCP Renew - lease parameters tftp file-cmreg-vmdg640-bbt062+voc-b.cm modified;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1;Fri 10/12/2021 10:43:015MIMO Event MIMO: Stored MIMO=-1 post cfg file MIMO=-1;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1;Fri 10/12/2021 10:55:195DBC-REQ Mismatch Between Calculated Value for P1.6hi Compared to CCAP Provided Value;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1;Sat 11/12/2021 13:42:296CM-STATUS message sent. Event Type Code: 2; Chan ID: 32; DSID: N/A; MAC Addr: N/A; OFDM/OFDMA Profile ID: N/A.;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1;Sat 11/12/2021 13:42:315Lost MDD Timeout;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1;Sat 11/12/2021 13:43:083Received Response to Broadcast Maintenance Request, But no Unicast Maintenance opportunities received - T4 time out;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1;Sat 11/12/2021 13:45:195MIMO Event MIMO: Stored MIMO=-1 post cfg file MIMO=-1;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1;Sat 11/12/2021 13:53:503SYNC Timing Synchronization failure - Loss of Sync;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1;Sat 11/12/2021 13:53:545Lost MDD Timeout;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1;Sat 11/12/2021 13:54:016CM-STATUS message sent. Event Type Code: 4; Chan ID: 3; DSID: N/A; MAC Addr: N/A; OFDM/OFDMA Profile ID: N/A.;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1;
on 17-12-2021 15:46
I think that the downstream power levels might be showing an amplifier that's been incorrectly setup, with excessive slope. It's not immediately obvious from the table because (in addition to the continuing failure of many Hub 4s to report pre and post-RS errors) the table isn't ranked in frequency order, as the Hub 3 results are. As and when the image gets approved you'll see what I mean where I charted your numbers power level versus frequency.
Ideally the power levels should be flattish or sloping gently downwards as frequency rises, but your numbers show what (to my mind) is far too steep a slope and too wide a range from highest to lowest. Whether that's the root cause of your problems I don't know, but it needs sorting.
on 18-12-2021 16:14
Thanks for your post and welcome to the Community Forums, Quinnaay,
Sorry to hear that you have been having connection issues. How has things been since your post?
I have run a remote diagnostic and have not been able to identify any issues with your connection.
We can also provide online broadband help here: https://www.virginmedia.com/help/services-support/broadband
Let us know if you need any further help.
Cheers,
Corey C
on 20-12-2021 12:39
@corey_c
still absolutely tragic and unplayable.
on 22-12-2021 12:55
Hi Quinnaay,
Thanks for coming back to us in the Community and apologies to hear things are continuing to look dreadful.
I can see that you are already in a conversation privately with my colleague regarding this. Due to this, I'm going to leave this with them 🙂
If you have any further issues, please let us know.
Thanks,