on 12-04-2023 15:22
Can someone help me figure out what’s going on with my BQM? Noticed since last Tuesday that some websites occasionally take a couple of clicks to load. They’d just hang and then click on the link again and it would load straight away. Thinking there might be some issue with the router, this led me to reinstalling the router software (once with Pfsense and again with Openwrt). The BQM has always been relatively flat, for a VM connection, since I joined last year. Since last night, I’ve had these blocks of yellow. They seem too flat and consistent to show congestion. Speeds are completely fine, near enough maxing out the line. I changed the WAN port to another one around 5:30pm ish. This seemed to drop the max latency for a bit, then it went back up. Ignore the red packet loss, that’s me doing things. I’ve done a reset using the button earlier on the hub.
Changed to router mode on the hub just before midnight. Disconnected the router and just left the connection idle with no devices connected for an hour. No change. I’m guessing it’s some issue between VM and Thinkbroadband. No idea what as if I run a traceroute, it looks normal.
My Broadband Ping
traceroute to pingbox1.thinkbroadband.com (80.249.99.164), 20 hops max, 46 byte packets
1 10.53.35.233 9.027 ms
2 82.2.246.81 10.747 ms
3 *
4 *
5 62.254.42.174 18.371 ms
6 *
7 84.116.135.50 15.721 ms
8 129.250.66.101 17.856 ms
9 129.250.3.214 17.983 ms
10 129.250.3.251 28.552 ms
11 192.80.16.146 15.428 ms
12 80.249.97.72 13.613 ms
13 80.249.97.90 14.463 ms
14 80.249.99.164 15.721 ms
A normal day for my connection:
My Broadband Ping
on 12-04-2023 17:24
13-04-2023 00:52 - edited 13-04-2023 00:54
Playing a game makes the graph “better”. Nowhere near as good as it was before whatever has changed.
https://www.thinkbroadband.com/broadband/monitoring/quality/share/da7c3dab548184e1ff3d8f577cac2f53c0679d8a-13-04-2023
on 13-04-2023 09:30
Interesting that Router mode and Modem mode show the exact same BQM trace, despite getting different WAN IP's.
Also your gaming periods seem very normal which just adds to the weirdness. I'm assuming all is well with your network logs and power levels?
I'm a Very Insightful Person, I'm here to share knowledge, I don't work for Virgin Media. Learn more
Have I helped? Click Mark as Helpful Answer or use Kudos to say thanks
on 13-04-2023 10:17
Downstream bonded channels
1 | 339000000 | 5.1 | 40 | QAM 256 | 26 |
2 | 139000000 | 7.8 | 42 | QAM 256 | 1 |
3 | 147000000 | 7.6 | 42 | QAM 256 | 2 |
4 | 155000000 | 7.5 | 42 | QAM 256 | 3 |
5 | 163000000 | 7.3 | 41 | QAM 256 | 4 |
6 | 171000000 | 7 | 41 | QAM 256 | 5 |
7 | 179000000 | 7.2 | 41 | QAM 256 | 6 |
8 | 187000000 | 7 | 41 | QAM 256 | 7 |
9 | 195000000 | 7.2 | 41 | QAM 256 | 8 |
10 | 203000000 | 6.9 | 41 | QAM 256 | 9 |
11 | 211000000 | 7 | 41 | QAM 256 | 10 |
12 | 219000000 | 6.7 | 41 | QAM 256 | 11 |
13 | 227000000 | 6.6 | 41 | QAM 256 | 12 |
14 | 235000000 | 6.3 | 41 | QAM 256 | 13 |
15 | 243000000 | 6.2 | 41 | QAM 256 | 14 |
16 | 251000000 | 6.2 | 41 | QAM 256 | 15 |
17 | 259000000 | 6.1 | 41 | QAM 256 | 16 |
18 | 267000000 | 6.1 | 41 | QAM 256 | 17 |
19 | 275000000 | 6 | 41 | QAM 256 | 18 |
20 | 283000000 | 6.1 | 41 | QAM 256 | 19 |
21 | 291000000 | 6 | 41 | QAM 256 | 20 |
22 | 299000000 | 6.1 | 41 | QAM 256 | 21 |
23 | 307000000 | 5.8 | 41 | QAM 256 | 22 |
24 | 315000000 | 5.7 | 41 | QAM 256 | 23 |
25 | 323000000 | 5.3 | 41 | QAM 256 | 24 |
26 | 331000000 | 5.4 | 41 | QAM 256 | 25 |
27 | 347000000 | 5.2 | 41 | QAM 256 | 27 |
28 | 355000000 | 4.9 | 41 | QAM 256 | 28 |
29 | 363000000 | 5 | 41 | QAM 256 | 29 |
30 | 371000000 | 5.1 | 41 | QAM 256 | 30 |
31 | 379000000 | 5.2 | 41 | QAM 256 | 31 |
Downstream bonded channels
1 | Locked | 40 | 2 | 0 |
2 | Locked | 42 | 5 | 0 |
3 | Locked | 42 | 6 | 0 |
4 | Locked | 42 | 11 | 0 |
5 | Locked | 41 | 5 | 0 |
6 | Locked | 41 | 7 | 0 |
7 | Locked | 41 | 1 | 0 |
8 | Locked | 41 | 3 | 0 |
9 | Locked | 41 | 2 | 0 |
10 | Locked | 41 | 2 | 0 |
11 | Locked | 41 | 2 | 0 |
12 | Locked | 41 | 3 | 0 |
13 | Locked | 41 | 1 | 0 |
14 | Locked | 41 | 17 | 0 |
15 | Locked | 41 | 95 | 0 |
16 | Locked | 41 | 3 | 0 |
17 | Locked | 41 | 1 | 0 |
18 | Locked | 41 | 52 | 0 |
19 | Locked | 41 | 0 | 0 |
20 | Locked | 41 | 36 | 0 |
21 | Locked | 41 | 3 | 0 |
22 | Locked | 41 | 3 | 0 |
23 | Locked | 41 | 4 | 0 |
24 | Locked | 41 | 25 | 0 |
25 | Locked | 41 | 17 | 0 |
26 | Locked | 41 | 3 | 0 |
27 | Locked | 41 | 1 | 0 |
28 | Locked | 41 | 2 | 0 |
29 | Locked | 41 | 1 | 0 |
30 | Locked | 41 | 2 | 0 |
31 | Locked | 41 | 2 | 0 |
Upstream bonded channels
0 | 49600000 | 46 | 5120 | QAM 64 | 1 |
1 | 43100000 | 45.5 | 5120 | QAM 64 | 2 |
2 | 36600000 | 45.5 | 5120 | QAM 64 | 3 |
3 | 30100000 | 45 | 5120 | QAM 64 | 4 |
4 | 23600000 | 44.8 | 5120 | QAM 64 | 5 |
Upstream bonded channels
0 | ATDMA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1 | ATDMA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2 | ATDMA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3 | ATDMA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
4 | ATDMA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Network Log
12-04-2023 00:52:26 | warning | DBC-REQ Mismatch Between Calculated Value for P1.6hi Compared to CCAP Provided Value;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; |
12-04-2023 00:52:26 | notice | US profile assignment change. US Chan ID: 6; Previous Profile: 13; New Profile: 11 13.;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; |
12-04-2023 00:52:23 | notice | REGISTRATION COMPLETE - Waiting for Operational status |
12-04-2023 00:52:17 | warning | Dynamic Range Window violation |
12-04-2023 00:52:17 | warning | RNG-RSP CCAP Commanded Power in Excess of 6 dB Below the Value Corresponding to the Top of the DRW;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; |
12-04-2023 00:52:17 | warning | RNG-RSP CCAP Commanded Power in Excess of 6 dB Below the Value Corresponding to the Top of the DRW;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; |
12-04-2023 00:52:17 | warning | RNG-RSP CCAP Commanded Power Exceeds Value Corresponding to the Top of the DRW;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; |
12-04-2023 00:52:17 | warning | REG-RSP-MP Mismatch Between Calculated Value for P1.6hi Compared to CCAP Provided Value;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; |
12-04-2023 00:52:17 | warning | Dynamic Range Window violation |
12-04-2023 00:52:17 | warning | Dynamic Range Window violation |
12-04-2023 00:52:17 | warning | RNG-RSP CCAP Commanded Power Exceeds Value Corresponding to the Top of the DRW;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; |
12-04-2023 00:52:17 | warning | Dynamic Range Window violation |
12-04-2023 00:52:17 | warning | Dynamic Range Window violation |
12-04-2023 00:52:17 | warning | Dynamic Range Window violation |
12-04-2023 00:52:17 | warning | RNG-RSP CCAP Commanded Power in Excess of 6 dB Below the Value Corresponding to the Top of the DRW;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; |
12-04-2023 00:52:17 | warning | RNG-RSP CCAP Commanded Power in Excess of 6 dB Below the Value Corresponding to the Top of the DRW;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; |
12-04-2023 00:52:12 | notice | DS profile assignment change. DS Chan ID: 32; Previous Profile: ; New Profile: 1 2 3.;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; |
12-04-2023 00:52:08 | notice | TLV-11 - unrecognized OID;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; |
12-04-2023 00:52:06 | warning | DHCP WARNING - Non-critical field invalid in response ;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; |
12-04-2023 00:52:04 | notice | Honoring MDD; IP provisioning mode = IPv4 |
12-04-2023 00:51:55 | critical | SYNC Timing Synchronization failure - Failed to acquire QAM/QPSK symbol timing;;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; |
12-04-2023 00:51:38 | critical | Cable Modem Reboot via RG reboot command |
11-04-2023 23:57:49 | critical | SYNC Timing Synchronization failure - Failed to acquire QAM/QPSK symbol timing;;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; |
11-04-2023 23:57:36 | critical | Cable Modem Reboot via RG reboot command |
11-04-2023 17:40:08 | critical | SYNC Timing Synchronization failure - Failed to acquire QAM/QPSK symbol timing;;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; |
11-04-2023 17:39:52 | critical | Cable Modem Reboot due to power button reset |
11-04-2023 15:41:31 | critical | SYNC Timing Synchronization failure - Failed to acquire QAM/QPSK symbol timing;;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; |
11-04-2023 15:41:14 | critical | Cable Modem Reboot via RG reboot command |
11-04-2023 15:34:40 | critical | No Ranging Response received - T3 time-out;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; |
11-04-2023 15:34:39 | critical | Ranging Request Retries exhausted;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; |
11-04-2023 15:33:43 | critical | No Ranging Response received - T3 time-out;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; |
11-04-2023 15:33:40 | critical | SYNC Timing Synchronization failure - Failed to acquire QAM/QPSK symbol timing;;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.1; |
13-04-2023 10:19 - edited 13-04-2023 10:21
All the power levels look ok. Network log seems ok as well. Weirdly, the graph was back to normal between ~7:45-8:45am this morning. Then back to having these blocks of latency.
on 14-04-2023 17:10
@Adduxi wrote:Interesting that Router mode and Modem mode show the exact same BQM trace, despite getting different WAN IP's.
Also your gaming periods seem very normal which just adds to the weirdness. I'm assuming all is well with your network logs and power levels?
It looks very like your BQM is watching someone else's IP.
on 14-04-2023 17:23
The BQM is monitoring the WAN IP that Openwrt is reporting, as well as other "What's my IP" sites 🙂
Couple of traceroutes for the IP addresses I can find for TBB's BQM.
Tracing route to pingbox1.thinkbroadband.com REMOVED
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms OpenWrt.lan [REMOVED
2 10 ms 9 ms 9 ms 10.53.35.233
3 9 ms 10 ms 9 ms wolv-core-2b-xe-1112-0.network.virginmedia.net [REMOVED
4 * * * Request timed out.
5 * * * Request timed out.
6 16 ms 17 ms 17 ms host-62-254-42.174.not-set-yet.virginmedia.net.42.254.62.in-addr.arpa [REMOVED
7 * * * Request timed out.
8 17 ms 17 ms 17 ms uk-lon01c-ri2-ae-6-0.aorta.net [REMOVED
9 21 ms 18 ms 17 ms ae-8.a02.londen12.uk.bb.gin.ntt.net [REMOVED]
10 17 ms 18 ms * ae-0.r20.londen12.uk.bb.gin.ntt.net REMOVED
11 * 20 ms 27 ms ae-13.a03.londen12.uk.bb.gin.ntt.net [REMOVED
12 17 ms 18 ms 17 ms REMOVED
13 17 ms 18 ms 19 ms te1-51-36.core-rs3.thdo.ncuk.net REMOVED
14 18 ms 19 ms 18 ms po5-32.core-rs4.thdo.ncuk.net
15 18 ms 19 ms 17 ms pingbox1.thinkbroadband.com [
Tracing route to ip99-171.thdo.ncuk.net REMOVED
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms OpenWrt.lan [REMOVED
2 9 ms 9 ms 9 ms 10.53.35.233
3 9 ms 9 ms 10 ms wolv-core-2a-xe-1112-0.network.virginmedia.net [82.2.246.45]
4 * * * Request timed out.
5 19 ms 19 ms 19 ms 86.85-254-62.static.virginmediabusiness.co.uk [REMOVED
6 22 ms 21 ms 19 ms ae-8.a02.londen12.uk.bb.gin.ntt.net [
7 16 ms 40 ms 14 ms ae-0.r21.londen12.uk.bb.gin.ntt.net [
8 19 ms 23 ms 19 ms ae-1.a03.londen12.uk.bb.gin.ntt.net [
9 19 ms 20 ms 32 ms 192.80.16.146
10 20 ms 21 ms 19 ms te1-51-36.core-rs3.thdo.ncuk.net [
11 20 ms 20 ms 18 ms po5-32.core-rs4.thdo.ncuk.net [
12 20 ms 20 ms 19 ms ip99-171.thdo.ncuk.net [
[MOD EDIT: Personal and private information has been removed from this post. Please do not post personal or private information in your public posts. Please review the Forum Guidelines]
14-04-2023 18:44 - edited 14-04-2023 18:46
So moderators apparently now think IP addresses in a traceroute are personal / private information and have warned Jon for copy/pasting it.
So everyone else no IP addresses, at all, allowed.
Moderator didn't even manage to redact all the IP addresses. Laughable.
on 14-04-2023 19:11
Haha, I hadn’t even noticed that. Traces didn’t even have the WAN IP in them.