cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Dropped kerb catv cover needs moving

Rowankemp01
Joining in

Hello I have recently had a dropped kerb done and have found a catv cover for my virgin media. It's currently on the pathway and is currently too steep and I will need to move this in order to get my pathway and drive level. 

Can someone point me in the right direction for this.

Regards 

Rowan

1000060996.jpg

18 REPLIES 18

Roger_Gooner
Alessandro Volta

I don't see how the council permit is valid when VM wasn't consulted on the Tee.

--
Note: My username is Roger_Gooner and not Alessandro Volta
Hub 5, TP-Link TL-SG108S 8-port gigabit switch, 360
My Broadband Ping - Roger's VM hub 5 broadband connection

jpeg1
Alessandro Volta

Is that cover projecting above the tarmac by the 50-60mm you mentioned? It doesn't look like that from the pictures.    If it's not then you will presumably be dropping the tarmac too.

But in either case if VM have to dig out the box and re-lay it lower down, the cables leading to it under the tarmac will have to excavated and laid lower too.

You may come to regret not having involved VM before the job was done. 

- jpeg1
My name is NOT Alessandro. That's just a tag Virginmedia sticks on some contributors. Please ignore it.

The tee box is level with the pathway at the moment but I will need it 50/60mm lower so I can drop the tarmac lower.

Yea unfortunately the contractor who done the work said it wouldn't need moving but to get the drive level the pathway needs to be lowered and therefore the box being lowered. 

jpeg1
Alessandro Volta

If you are going to drop the height of the pavement you will need to get a new permission from the council because there will be be new slopes either side for pedestrians walking past. That will be the time to involve VM. 

- jpeg1
My name is NOT Alessandro. That's just a tag Virginmedia sticks on some contributors. Please ignore it.

Our pavement is soo steep lowering it will make it level so easy for people to walk over. The work hasn't been signed off from the council yet so will mention it to them. 

1000060997.jpg

jpeg1
Alessandro Volta

I was this thinking of the slopes either side of the section you want to drop, but that is for the council. But to drop the box and probably the cables will certainly involve VM. It might be worth getting them involved sooner rather than later because their street works contractors are not noted for speed.

- jpeg1
My name is NOT Alessandro. That's just a tag Virginmedia sticks on some contributors. Please ignore it.


@jpeg1 wrote:

You may come to regret not having involved VM before the job was done. 


That's not how the process works. You have to apply for permission and pay a non-refundable £118 in the case of my Hillingdon council to get a dropped kerb (my council calls it a "domestic crossover"), and the council's Highway Authority evaluates the application. One of the many issues under evaluation is utility properties and I quote what Hillingdon's Highway Authority does:

"If a utility company box or telegraph pole is situated within the area of the proposed crossover, including the tapers on either side, it will be referred to the utility company in question for inspection. They will state whether it will be necessary to lower or relocate this apparatus, and the additional cost of such works will be borne by the applicant."

So, it's up to the council to contact VM in this case to find out what action - if any - VM will take. If VM won't move the pavement Tee then the council cannot issue a permit for the dropped kerb.

There is something else which is odd. When I first saw the photos my first thought was that this dropped kerb looked nothing like all others I've seen. In the case of Hillingdon council, which i accept may not be the same as other councils, you cannot have dropped kerb across the width of your frontage (which it seems to be in the OP's case). Here is their policy.

"Where a property has an existing hardstanding that is significantly wider than the width of the crossover applied for (e.g., a 2.4m crossover serving a hardstanding capable of accommodating two or more:
a) The crossover width may be widened to match the width of the hardstanding up to a maximum width of 5m or 50% of the width of the frontage of the property (whichever is greater)."

--
Note: My username is Roger_Gooner and not Alessandro Volta
Hub 5, TP-Link TL-SG108S 8-port gigabit switch, 360
My Broadband Ping - Roger's VM hub 5 broadband connection

jpeg1
Alessandro Volta

Yes of course that's the correct, in fact the only, procedure. 

My comment that you quoted was in reply to this, which appeared to suggest that the procedure hadn't been followed. 

"Yea I'm guessing maybe so we got the permit back pretty quick even after it was checked over. We would only really needing it to be dropped maybe 50/60mm" 

- jpeg1
My name is NOT Alessandro. That's just a tag Virginmedia sticks on some contributors. Please ignore it.

Steven_L
Forum Team
Forum Team

Hey Rowankemp01,

Welcome to the community and thanks for taking the time to post here on the forums. We would not be able to help any further from here and the best advise would be to contact the team using the below link that was given earlier in the thread for this, the issues from that form will be sent directly to the concerned team and they will get in touch once your query has been picked up to discuss further. 

 

Diversionary works

 

Kind Regards,

Steven_L