Package price not honest
Hi All
Renewed my package in August and agreed a package price of £76 inclusive of sky sports and tnt sports. Since august I have been consistently charged £94, after lots of complaining I was told that I could have this for £43. But each month I was still getting charged £94! I have chat records and a voice recording confirming this. I sent the chat records to the complaints team and they emailed me saying that they would do sky sports and broadband for £43 via email. When I got back in touch to see if they had missed the tnt sports off I
was told this was all a mistake and I would be charged the full £94!!! This was their final resolve!! The manager from customer complaints said that his colleagues had misled me and all I can do is with take £174 to keep me quiet or go to the ombudsman. The customer service has been diabolical!!! I have been told so many prices and think it has been resolved just to go back to square one. I’m now at a loss and will have to go to the ombudsman, has anyone had any experience of this? I am being seriously affected by the whole saga and don’t know where to turn!!!
- If you have reached deadlock with VM and VM has said to go to the ombudsman, then you should be provided with a deadlock letter by VM. You can use that to go to the ombudsman or, if 8 weeks have passed since you first complained to VM, you can go to the ombudsman without need of the letter. Process is explained below - https://www.commsombudsman.org/our-process - There is some useful advice below about preparing evidence for the ombudsman - The above was actually for a delayed installation claim but the principles are the same. Set out the sequence of events in a timeline that is easy for the adjudicator to understand. Support the entries on the timeline with whatever evidence you have available (such as emails, messages, screenshots etc.) - If you need further evidence you might need to put in a DSAR to get that - https://www.virginmedia.com/help/dsar - People who have used the ombudsman, and reported back in topics on here, have said it was a fair and accessible process.