Ombudsman Evidence
Hi all
I think I'm going to have to go to the Ombudsman regarding my contract.
Basically I am a broadband customer and in late march I ordered TV and while the box was on it's way to me I realised that I couldn't use the box as my TV was at the other end of the room to my router.
I didn't realise the box needed to be directly plugged into it. Therefore I spoke to chat and said I needed to cancel TV and I would be sending back the box. Within the 14 day cooling off period right...
I spoke to them again online chat to make sure, they never sent me the returns labels so I downloaded them myself and sent the box back, unopened, unused, via approved tracking method.
Then comes my next bill and they are charging me for TV and I'm on a new 18 month contract.
I called them and I was given £4 credit on my account and was then ASSURED my bill would go back to normal without the TV, just broadband. Then, of course, next month, they are still charging me for TV.
I raised a complaint (27 days, still nothing) . So a few days ago I thought I'd have a stab at resolving this via online chat one last time. I explained it and was put through to cancellations, I thought I was getting somewhere then I was told if they removed TV I would now be paying £60 a month!
(my broadband is about £33/34). This was despite her acknowledging I contacted them in late march telling them I was sending the box back and to cancel. They wilfully didn't cancel the TV in the 14 day period and are now basically stating I can't remove the TV without a penalty because the 14 day window has long since past. This is crazy, I can't believe how ridiculous and full of lies VM customer services are.
My question really is, do the Ombudsman require proper 'evidence' to believe my complaint??
I don't have a record of the chats (though VM clearly do) - I couldn't record them on my work computer, long story.
All I have is an email showing they credited me £4 for one month TV refund, surely this shows they were wrong to charge me.
Thanks