AFAIK, they don’t mix RFoG and XGS-PON inn the same locality. XGS-PON is provided on the NexFibre infrastructure and hooked up to VM at a peering point (open to correction there).
If you speak to any neighbour who has VM, if they have a white box attached to the inside wall, connected to the mains, then you will be getting an XGS-PON service which mean offer your 2Gbps now and up to 10Gbps at some market driven future stage.
Finally to say - FTTP is well overhyped save for the higher attainable speeds. It’s main advantage is that for XGS-PON, upstream speeds are bounded only by the laws of physics (light transmission) whereas coax speeds are bounded by a noise prone frequency range.
RFoG has its advantages over coax because although there is the same narrow upstream frequency range, it is not noise prone due to light transmission rather than copper.
My 1Gbps is coax and has never glitched. My 100Mbps upstream is all I need, though some people would want more for their purposes.
Full Fibre has its limitations too. There are only so many wavelengths of light that a fibre (you get 1 fibre) can carry in either direction and they must not interfere with each other. At the fibre aggregation point, everyone’s traffic comes together and the trick there is for VM to have enough fibres onto which that load can be multiplexed without significant queuing. That ism the dark art we’ll never be informed about as to detail but I think I trust VM tom get that part right.
”Full Fibre” is overhyped for marketing purposes, but it is a good thing.