cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Why are VM not sharing the ducting ?

Bu11seye
On our wavelength

I have recently discovered that Virgin Media, despite their claims to the contrary, is indeed able to utilize Openreach's ducting infrastructure. This revelation is a clear violation of OFCOM regulations, and it is essential that consumers are aware of the implications.

According to the OFCOM regulations, specifically Section 81 of the Communications Act 2003, all network operators must share physical infrastructure in order to promote fair competition and ensure efficient deployment of telecom services. This means that companies like Virgin Media should have access to the shared ducting infrastructure managed by Openreach.

The regulations require Openreach to provide reasonable access to its ducts, poles, and other infrastructure to other telecom operators. This principle of infrastructure sharing aims to eliminate unnecessary duplication and reduce the cost and time required for network deployment. By doing so, it encourages competition, leading to better services and competitive pricing for consumers.

Despite these regulations, Virgin Media has consistently claimed that it does not have access to the shared ducting infrastructure managed by Openreach. This not only misleads consumers but also creates an unfair advantage for Virgin Media, as they can avoid the costs and delays associated with installing their own infrastructure.

It is crucial to understand the implications of this violation. By not utilizing the shared ducting infrastructure, Virgin Media can potentially exclude certain areas or regions where they would have had access if they followed the regulations. This leads to a lack of choice for consumers and limits competition in the market, ultimately resulting in higher prices and poorer service quality.

Furthermore, the use of shared infrastructure is not a new requirement. These regulations have been in effect since the Communications Act 2003 was passed, meaning that for almost two decades, companies like Virgin Media have been obligated to share infrastructure with other operators. It is disheartening to see Virgin Media neglecting their responsibilities and hindering fair competition for their own benefit.

 

11 REPLIES 11


@dnpark38 wrote:

Very interesting post.

The difference in cable is that why BT/OpenReach and City Cable can offer Sky and the other providers or is it just VM that wants to limit competition?


Both Openreach and VM are working towards all-fibre networks with XGS-PON technology. Once that happens there will be no longer a traditional distinction between a telco and a cableco as everything - broadband, linear TV, VOD and voice - will be delivered over IP. The customer can only benefit.

--
Hub 5, TP-Link TL-SG108S 8-port gigabit switch, 360
My Broadband Ping - Roger's VM hub 5 broadband connection


@Adduxi wrote:

The bigger problem is who fixes things?  If a shared duct collapses who is responsible?  Similar with the poles, who replaces old ones that are deemed rotten and unsafe?  I can imagine a fault call being passed between VM and OR, as "oh that's not our problem ....."


Unless there is an agreement otherwise the duct will always be repaired by its owner. It's no different to when a Sky customer whose broadband fails because of a collapsed duct, and Sky reports the problem to Openreach for them to fix it.

--
Hub 5, TP-Link TL-SG108S 8-port gigabit switch, 360
My Broadband Ping - Roger's VM hub 5 broadband connection