cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Intermittent (but serious) upstream issues

cabbagelover
Tuning in

Hi All,

Desperately struggling with intermittent upstream speed issues that make it impossible to work at home.  Service status checker first reports no issues with our connection, but when asking it to check further, it confirms there is a known issue in our area being worked on.  Have called VM customer support multiple times, but all I am given is an expected fix date which is constantly missed, and apologies that they will not do anything else (no details whatsoever about what the problem actually is, no engineer visit, and no compensation).

In terms of what happens, upstream speed drops from usual 25mbps down to prolonged period of 0.1-0.5mbps.  A speed checker app suggests no issue with download speed, which remains at 275mbps.  There are no error lights on router, and in most instances the upload speed returns around 4-6 hours later - usually just as working day ends.  Working from home, I am completely unable to have video calls, upload anything to our cloud filing, send or receive emails, and print documents wirelessly.

I have managed to get through to a floor supervisor once on phone once (on 02/01/23) - advice then was that issue has been taking place since 9th December.  At the time, the supervisor suggested they had spoken directly to an engineer who was on site replacing a cable - but problem continues despite being assured it would finally be over by 04/01/23.  

Issue has got so bad - and financially damaging for our working - that have yesterday ordered a temporary 5G router to use during moments of outage.  Any advice how to reclaim these costs from Virgin gratefully received, although ultimately just hoping this post might reach the expert moderators and provide means to escalate or at least give some assurance on what is going on and when it might be fixed!

Router logs to follow.  Have today set up a BQM which I will share tomorrow am.  Am fairly non-technical, but really incredibly grateful for any and all advice.  Thank you in advance!

18 REPLIES 18

cabbagelover
Tuning in

Downstream bonded channels

Channel

Frequency (Hz)

Power (dBmV)

SNR (dB)

Modulation

Channel ID

1

235000000

3.5

40

256 qam

13

2

139000000

2

38

256 qam

1

3

147000000

2.2

38

256 qam

2

4

155000000

2.4

40

256 qam

3

5

163000000

2.2

40

256 qam

4

6

171000000

2.2

40

256 qam

5

7

179000000

1.7

38

256 qam

6

8

187000000

1.7

38

256 qam

7

9

195000000

1.7

38

256 qam

8

10

203000000

1.9

38

256 qam

9

11

211000000

2.5

38

256 qam

10

12

219000000

2.9

38

256 qam

11

13

227000000

3.2

40

256 qam

12

14

243000000

3.7

40

256 qam

14

15

251000000

4

40

256 qam

15

16

259000000

4.1

40

256 qam

16

17

267000000

4.5

40

256 qam

17

18

275000000

4.4

40

256 qam

18

19

283000000

4.8

40

256 qam

19

20

291000000

4.9

40

256 qam

20

21

299000000

5.4

40

256 qam

21

22

307000000

5

40

256 qam

22

23

315000000

5.1

40

256 qam

23

24

323000000

5.3

40

256 qam

24




Downstream bonded channels

Channel

Locked Status

RxMER (dB)

Pre RS Errors

Post RS Errors

1

Locked

40.9

10

0

2

Locked

38.9

50

0

3

Locked

38.9

25

0

4

Locked

40.3

16

0

5

Locked

40.3

15

0

6

Locked

40.3

24

0

7

Locked

38.9

9

0

8

Locked

38.9

21

0

9

Locked

38.9

11

0

10

Locked

38.9

17

0

11

Locked

38.9

8

0

12

Locked

38.9

15

0

13

Locked

40.9

9

0

14

Locked

40.3

6

0

15

Locked

40.3

10

0

16

Locked

40.3

21

0

17

Locked

40.3

8

0

18

Locked

40.3

14

0

19

Locked

40.3

15

0

20

Locked

40.3

6

0

21

Locked

40.3

10

0

22

Locked

40.3

16

0

23

Locked

40.3

10

0

24

Locked

40.3

16

0

cabbagelover
Tuning in

Upstream bonded channels

Channel

Frequency (Hz)

Power (dBmV)

Symbol Rate (ksps)

Modulation

Channel ID

1

30099959

38

5120

16 qam

10

2

43099395

37.5

5120

16 qam

8

3

23600183

38

5120

16 qam

11

4

49598737

37.5

5120

16 qam

7

5

36599227

37.8

5120

16 qam

9




Upstream bonded channels

Channel

Channel Type

T1 Timeouts

T2 Timeouts

T3 Timeouts

T4 Timeouts

1

ATDMA

0

0

56

0

2

ATDMA

0

0

52

0

3

ATDMA

0

0

67

0

4

ATDMA

0

0

52

0

5

ATDMA

0

0

83

0

 

Network Log

Time

Priority

Description

19/01/2023 10:04:49

critical

No Ranging Response received - T3 time-out;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;

19/01/2023 10:04:49

critical

Started Unicast Maintenance Ranging - No Response received - T3 time-out;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;

19/01/2023 10:01:33

critical

TFTP file complete - but missing mandatory TLV;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;

16/01/2023 17:36:51

critical

No Ranging Response received - T3 time-out;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;

16/01/2023 09:39:3

Error

DHCP RENEW WARNING - Field invalid in response v4 option;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;

13/01/2023 05:52:12

critical

No Ranging Response received - T3 time-out;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;

12/01/2023 21:39:3

Error

DHCP RENEW WARNING - Field invalid in response v4 option;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;

10/01/2023 00:36:39

critical

No Ranging Response received - T3 time-out;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;

10/01/2023 00:27:52

Error

DHCP RENEW WARNING - Field invalid in response v4 option;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;

10/01/2023 00:27:50

Error

DHCP RENEW sent - No response for IPv4;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;

09/01/2023 10:44:3

critical

No Ranging Response received - T3 time-out;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;

09/01/2023 10:42:31

Error

DHCP RENEW sent - No response for IPv4;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;

05/01/2023 20:05:23

critical

No Ranging Response received - T3 time-out;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;

05/01/2023 05:50:12

Error

DHCP RENEW WARNING - Field invalid in response v4 option;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;

02/01/2023 11:16:29

critical

No Ranging Response received - T3 time-out;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;

02/01/2023 11:15:18

notice

LAN login Success;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;

02/01/2023 10:57:52

critical

No Ranging Response received - T3 time-out;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;

02/01/2023 10:56:13

notice

LAN login Success;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;

01/01/2023 03:05:8

critical

No Ranging Response received - T3 time-out;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;

31/12/2022 19:33:41

Error

DHCP RENEW WARNING - Field invalid in response v4 option;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;

 

So the non technical explanation is the Upstream channels are impacted confirming the experience as reported.

To see the issue in the stats, look at the Upstream bonded channels

In this case there are 5 Upstream bonded channels but all have dropped down to Modulation 16 qam.

16 qam is the slowest upstream rate that maintains a connection even when there is severe noise issues on the service.

32 qam is the medium upstream rate used when there is light noise issues.

64 qam is the fast rate for normal service. ( each 64 qam channel = 27 Mb/s of upstream bandwidth )

Once the local fault (damaged cables etc) have been repaired the Upstream channels should all come back to 64 qam.

Thank you for the reply and detail - it is appreciated.

After another very frustrating afternoon not able to work, and with continued apathy from Virgin customer service, have now arranged for disconnection. Fingers crossed a new provider will be able to give us more certainty.

Sadly Virgin Media's service can be like chalk and cheese.

legacy1
Alessandro Volta

Not sure how VM are doing this but they only mostly care about download speed but heres the tricky part to download you have to upload send back small ACK packets which is way more bandwidth then 1Mb for 275Mb download. So clearly VM have done some priority QoS/BWM.

example

Screenshot 2022-09-23 151337.png

---------------------------------------------------------------

The modem uses ACK suppression, so you need to measure at the other end, if you want to know how many ACKs that get through.

legacy1
Alessandro Volta
So this ACK suppression is done in modem mode too?

What if this ACK suppression in the Docsis modem is flawed causing an attacker to limit ones bandwidth in some way?
---------------------------------------------------------------

Yes, it also works in modem mode. It works by throwing away unnecessary ACKs between bursts. You should be safe from attackers. 🙂