Menu
Reply
SonarUK
  • 617
  • 26
  • 81
Rising star
357 Views
Message 1 of 4
Flag for a moderator

upstream power levels to high?

My downstream seem fine but should upstream be sitting on 51? everyone who i see posting logs are sitting down near 40-45.
 
Downstream bonded channelsChannel Frequency (Hz) Power (dBmV) SNR (dB) Modulation Channel ID
1379000000-2.238256 qam31
2203000000-0.740256 qam9
3211000000-0.740256 qam10
4219000000-0.940256 qam11
5227000000-140256 qam12
6235000000-1.240256 qam13
7243000000-1.540256 qam14
8251000000-1.440256 qam15
9259000000-1.440256 qam16
10267000000-1.440256 qam17
11275000000-1.540256 qam18
12283000000-1.740256 qam19
13291000000-1.540256 qam20
14299000000-1.440256 qam21
15307000000-240256 qam22
16315000000-2.438256 qam23
17323000000-2.440256 qam24
18331000000-2.238256 qam25
19339000000-1.940256 qam26
20347000000-2.240256 qam27
21355000000-2.540256 qam28
22363000000-2.740256 qam29
23371000000-2.438256 qam30
24387000000-2.540256 qam32


Downstream bonded channelsChannel Locked Status RxMER (dB) Pre RS Errors Post RS Errors
1Locked38.9200
2Locked40.3140
3Locked40.3130
4Locked40.9130
5Locked40.3150
6Locked40.9150
7Locked40.3170
8Locked40.3120
9Locked40.3210
10Locked40.3160
11Locked40.3160
12Locked40.3140
13Locked40.3170
14Locked40.3180
15Locked40.3250
16Locked38.9440
17Locked40.3280
18Locked38.6340
19Locked40.3290
20Locked40.9150
21Locked40.3200
22Locked40.3130
23Locked38.9260
24Locked40.3180

 

Upstream bonded channelsChannel Frequency (Hz) Power (dBmV) Symbol Rate (ksps) Modulation Channel ID
13940000050.8512064 qam4
24619998351512064 qam3
35370001451512064 qam2
46029999151512064 qam1

Upstream bonded channelsChannel Channel Type T1 Timeouts T2 Timeouts T3 Timeouts T4 Timeouts
1ATDMA0000
2ATDMA0000
3ATDMA0000
4ATDMA0000

https://twitter.com/SeriousFamily

M500 | Hub 3 Modem Mode | Asus RT-AX86U | Asus RT-AC86U
0 Kudos
Reply
jbrennand
  • 30.73K
  • 3.04K
  • 5.82K
Very Insightful Person
Very Insightful Person
345 Views
Message 2 of 4
Flag for a moderator

Re: upstream power levels to high?

51 is near the top of the acceptable range, VM will tell you there are many connections with higher levels (~54) that are working just fine.

All your other data looks good - what issues are you actually having?

Have you got a BQM running and what do the Network logs look like?

--------------------
John
--------------------

I do not work for VM. My services: HD TV on VIP (+ Sky Sports & Movies & BT sport), x3 V6 boxes (1 wired 2 WiFi,) SH2 in modem mode with Airport Extreme Router +2 Airport Express's. On VIVID200, Talk Anytime Phone, x2 Mobile SIM only iPhones.
0 Kudos
Reply
SonarUK
  • 617
  • 26
  • 81
Rising star
341 Views
Message 3 of 4
Flag for a moderator

Re: upstream power levels to high?

no problems right now, but the 24th was a little sketchy for the day (the worst its been within 3 years) so i created the bqm.

my area just an upgrade that forced all the hubs "smart wifi" back to enabled unless opt-out through email.
this didnt bother me as im in modem mode.

but i thought ide check my hub stats to see if that did bother me at all

BQM is clean
https://www.thinkbroadband.com/broadband/monitoring/quality/share/3e0563b9aa63c635ef9fb90280bf610292...

Network LogTime Priority Description
24/08/2021 10:31:42Warning!RCS Partial Service;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;
24/08/2021 10:31:42criticalSYNC Timing Synchronization failure - Loss of Sync;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;
24/08/2021 10:31:30Warning!RCS Partial Service;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;
24/08/2021 10:30:51criticalReceived Response to Broadcast Maintenance Request, But no Unicast Maintenance opportunities received - T4 time out;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;
24/08/2021 10:29:57Warning!Lost MDD Timeout;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;
24/08/2021 10:29:52Warning!RCS Partial Service;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;
24/08/2021 10:29:52criticalSYNC Timing Synchronization failure - Loss of Sync;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;
24/08/2021 10:29:52Warning!RCS Partial Service;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;
24/08/2021 10:29:52criticalSYNC Timing Synchronization failure - Loss of Sync;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;
24/08/2021 10:18:13Warning!RCS Partial Service;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;
24/08/2021 10:18:4criticalReceived Response to Broadcast Maintenance Request, But no Unicast Maintenance opportunities received - T4 time out;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;
24/08/2021 10:17:27Warning!Lost MDD Timeout;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;
24/08/2021 10:17:22criticalSYNC Timing Synchronization failure - Loss of Sync;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;
24/08/2021 10:17:22Warning!RCS Partial Service;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;
24/08/2021 10:17:22criticalSYNC Timing Synchronization failure - Loss of Sync;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;
24/08/2021 10:17:21Warning!RCS Partial Service;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;
23/08/2021 06:38:24criticalNo Ranging Response received - T3 time-out;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;
22/08/2021 18:46:53noticeDHCP Renew - lease parameters tftp file-cmreg-vmdg505-bbt053-b.cm modified;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;
22/08/2021 18:46:53ErrorDHCP RENEW WARNING - Field invalid in response v4 option;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;
22/08/2021 17:02:0Warning!RCS Partial Service;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=

https://twitter.com/SeriousFamily

M500 | Hub 3 Modem Mode | Asus RT-AX86U | Asus RT-AC86U
0 Kudos
Reply
Alex_RM
  • 6.31K
  • 328
  • 463
Forum Team
Forum Team
264 Views
Message 4 of 4
Flag for a moderator

Re: upstream power levels to high?

Hi SonarUK,

 

Thanks for posting,

 

As jbrennand your BQM looks like, and the upstream channels are at the high end, but still within spec.

 

If you do start to experience issues with the connection please let us know.

 

Alex_Rm

 

 

0 Kudos
Reply