The volume is not the problem for any gamers the amount of traffic you use is miniscule unless you also stream 128kb up and down is all I need to race 60 cars on a 20km track with competitors spread out all over the world, gaming transmits relitavely little data but even at 128kb VM cannot supply sufficient quality or sufficient packets, as a rule 1-3% loss is barely noticed but with VM losses are no where near 3-4% but ten times that 30-40%.
I agree wholeheartedly. VM MUST as a matter of priority invest in sufficient quality and sufficient packets!
Also what now?
I'm a Very Insightful Person, I'm here to share knowledge, I don't work for Virgin Media. Learn more
Have I helped? Click Mark as Helpful Answer or use Kudos to say thanks
Re: LATENCY with VM a JOKE 10mb on any other providers 20 times as stable as 100mb VM
Same troll on every post a useless little man sitting behind a screen pushing the not our fault BS from VM seems strange a talk talk service from next door 3mbs down 1mbs up linked with same 10mtr lan has zero problems when 100mbs down 10mbs, up from Virgin cannot provide 128kbs up and down.
Absolute proof that virgin BS as spouted by its tame trolls is not even worth the electrons wasted in displaying it if you've got nothing usefull to say UTFS.