on 14-09-2023 15:54
I'm getting emails returned sometimes when mailing to groups.io. This does not happen when I use a different mail sender, just blueyonder email.
Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 500 Invalid request, no reverse DNS for 84.116.50.34
Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 500 Invalid request, no reverse DNS for 84.116.50.35
Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 500 Invalid request, no reverse DNS for 84.116.50.37
Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 500 Invalid request, no reverse DNS for 84.116.50.41
So should blueyonder/virginmedia be fixing this by providing the appropriate reverse DNS data for all their outbound mail servers, or is the issue somewhere else like at groups.io? Whois seems happy with the IP addresses.
Thanks,
David
Answered! Go to Answer
15-09-2023 10:00 - edited 15-09-2023 10:01
@David-J-Taylor wrote:So should blueyonder/virginmedia be fixing this by providing the appropriate reverse DNS data for all their outbound mail servers, or is the issue somewhere else like at groups.io?
That's very strange. I have just done a reverse DNS check using this checker https://mxtoolbox.com/ReverseLookup for all those mail servers and they all seem to be coming up ok. For example
Are you still getting that error and if so is it from just one recipient or all recipient?
If the mail servers that VM use did not have a valid reverse DNS then the forum would be going mad with loads of people complaining that they could not send VM emails.
Coenoby
I'm a Very Insightful Person, I'm here to share knowledge, I don't work for Virgin Media.
Have I helped? Click Mark as Helpful Answer or use Kudos to say thanks
15-09-2023 10:00 - edited 15-09-2023 10:01
@David-J-Taylor wrote:So should blueyonder/virginmedia be fixing this by providing the appropriate reverse DNS data for all their outbound mail servers, or is the issue somewhere else like at groups.io?
That's very strange. I have just done a reverse DNS check using this checker https://mxtoolbox.com/ReverseLookup for all those mail servers and they all seem to be coming up ok. For example
Are you still getting that error and if so is it from just one recipient or all recipient?
If the mail servers that VM use did not have a valid reverse DNS then the forum would be going mad with loads of people complaining that they could not send VM emails.
Coenoby
I'm a Very Insightful Person, I'm here to share knowledge, I don't work for Virgin Media.
Have I helped? Click Mark as Helpful Answer or use Kudos to say thanks
on 15-09-2023 13:44
Yes, I checked here and saw reverse DNS appeared OK. It's just groups.io, but only an VM servers.
on 15-09-2023 14:58
@David-J-Taylor wrote:It's just groups.io, but only an VM servers.
Thanks for coming back. I have no experience of using groups.io but a quick search revealed that they may have previous form with reporting apparently spurious DNS errors, see here: https://groups.io/g/GroupManagersForum/topic/unable_to_post_to_my_group
Admittedly that was a few years ago and I am also not entirely sure that post is entirely relevant to your experience.
Scroll to the bottom of that page and you will see the comment "This has cropped up from time to time before, but I don't recall if there was a resolution".
They also suggest the best advice is "to use a different email service." You said in your first post that you don't get the problem when using your other email service so I think that would be a good work around.
You could contact groups.io, they may have an answer or at the very least give some information as to why the VM servers are failing group.io's checks when no-one else seems to be reporting any issues with VM's setup.
That would at least give the technical VM teams something concrete to work with.
One of the VM Forum Team (VM staff) will be contacting you via this thread hopefully today bit all they can do is pass it on to the relevant technical team. My feeling is that the VM technical team will say they cannot see an issue on their side.
In my opinion a bit more clarification from groups.io would definitely be helpful.
Coenoby
I'm a Very Insightful Person, I'm here to share knowledge, I don't work for Virgin Media.
Have I helped? Click Mark as Helpful Answer or use Kudos to say thanks
on 15-09-2023 18:47
Yds, well "please pass to mail team" was my first request to VM who said they have no way of contacting the team, hence the present circus go-around! I will try to attach a full error 500 response here. Oh, there doesn't seem to be an attach, so inline it is.
Well, it seems it isn't valid HTML - damn it it's text! Give up.
Cheers,
David
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. You sent the following message, but this message could not be delivered to all recipients: ====================================================================== Subject: PP-log-report-from-Edinburgh-2023/09/13 Plane Plotter with the Beast report from David Taylor, Edinburgh 2023/09/13 Created with [removed] report toolkit V2.3.0 .. download: https://www.satsignal.eu/software/MakePlanePlotterReport.zip .. support: https://groups.io/g/SatSignal Times are UTC Hex Callsign Reg Type ====================================================================== The following addresses failed: mode-s-logs@mode-s.groups.io host lb01.groups.io [45.79.81.153] SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:<mode-s-logs@mode-s.groups.io>: 500 Invalid request, no reverse DNS for 84.116.50.34
Reporting-MTA: dns; csmtpq3-prd-nl1-vmo.edge.unified.services Action: failed Final-Recipient: rfc822;mode-s-logs@mode-s.groups.io Status: 5.0.0 Remote-MTA: dns; lb01.groups.io Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 500 Invalid request, no reverse DNS for 84.116.50.34
Return-path: Received: from csmtp2-prd-nl1-vmo.nl1.unified.services ([100.107.82.134] helo=csmtp2-prd-nl1-vmo.edge.unified.services) by csmtpq3-prd-nl1-vmo.edge.unified.services with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from id 1qgbfH-005l8L-DK for mode-s-logs@mode-s.groups.io; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 04:01:07 +0200 Received: from Penguin ([94.173.109.94]) by csmtp2-prd-nl1-vmo.edge.unified.services with ESMTP id gbfGq9XmJELBSgbfGqEl8V; Thu, 14 Sep 2023 04:01:06 +0200 X-SourceIP: 94.173.109.94 X-Authenticated-Sender: X-Spam: 0 X-Authority: v=2.4 cv=BvRbg6b5 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=65026963 cx=a_exe a=0Phw9gWqIWPY8f+80Oz75g==:117 a=0Phw9gWqIWPY8f+80Oz75g==:17 a=lTlhYo7Vy8wA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=zNV7Rl7Rt7sA:10 a=x7bEGLp0ZPQA:10 a=s737VkUKAAAA:8 a=xjGz-wBMAAAA:8 a=3P5sqBuiDDgM-X5aa4wA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=mOq6DAjrsDIA:10 a=S-GYQWcP1LYA:10 a=QqLz7FFICcgA:10 a=5o_IIZbK0doA:10 a=2oYEQEACNykA:10 a=qtq9ZRtw7dYA:10 a=L9oRO5KordkA:10 a=aIyZJjzaFyYA:10 a=xgKYKKR0cm8A:10 a=8r0DW0ogp6cA:10 a=hUyhKhkIzugA:10 a=HKdOesaLNeUA:10 a=wXhNV9iNw-IA:10 a=Q5XjUIiaKrUA:10 a=kxvfXriKUysA:10 a=vqLbjFO2wWIA:10 a=rC09DVOK8AIA:10 a=oNz6GU8EUhIA:10 a=z-aNoeO6urIA:10 a=-FEs8UIgK8oA:10 a=Sx8MoD7OCzCZbbIUTj5V:22 a=dmbvPvuLAiAwK5y7oBu2:22 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=blueyonder.co.uk; s=meg.feb2017; t=1694656867; bh=8U576suPXCsLtuz/TlWd891+Nfqyf/Qg+Ujfh11glws=; h=Date:From:To:Subject; b=K3CZ+eybG/+5blxob43ACJVg1mB0yHohTq03T1Gukqcs36c5dT/estvp1ikE8AtO8 S20qyCY30bUag+VF0hlTcfa8RcwNjsm8qTsUND066eEcdxgYEjSbpYcCKMzbVLTMSd 5K9pnpUPxMdyOt4rrlBJo9OizAc8x9XXd3IJ5MvU5xbDn63gt767yuvR+ly9AQGlGg yk/esV4rtELm76Qr+UiBeeChOTGLAxdQ/7RISsMTGE2P0kTRD3ZEVPmVR7e4d/ORzc UCgEe6mUZkArBfxaMPrltakyiFhb9xKvpZpC3WXIyCdP0xvm0v8uPS+eAwAkrlyn1N KR6bsegNkZm2A== Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 03:01:06 +0100 From: [removed] @blueyonder.co.uk To: mode-s-logs@mode-S.groups.io, david-taylor@blueyonder.co.uk X-Mailer: Blat v2.6.2 w/GSS encryption, a Win32 SMTP/NNTP mailer http://www.blat.net Message-ID: <01d9e6af$Blat.v2.6.2$5276b3b0$8918f8c52548@blueyonder.co.uk> Subject: PP-log-report-from-Edinburgh-2023/09/13 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfKyBf2KXUkvCMr6BR81mMcUTfAP2PAChuoz6JoRHCvWuxUWgtuLE6+W5bO1TpGmSXz7aRmv1G98qd07BgoVqJr2JPMfHucVM8MrFgL4cWkyK/uiBLv3H L42S/4JhJSgG6Cr9lvjNECmGYg/NqHauDV7tGufzdI0TuvaSCpBMiHjz5aYg6enSXq3BypJ/hQKz5cnxKDMYmf49jWT4xINlE/6N+7yiZfscEpxEQQHE7WoQ erh0oKwBDslB43KDTGUk2w== X-Exim-DSN-Information: Due to administrative limits only headers are returned
[MOD EDIT: Personal and private information has been removed from this post. Please do not post personal or private information in your public posts. Please review the Forum Guidelines]
16-09-2023 11:25 - edited 16-09-2023 11:34
I replied to you earlier this morning but my post seems to have disappeared.
I have notified the forum moderators to redact your email address from the post. It's a bad idea to post your email address on an open forum😉
I would hope that the forum team will give you a better response then you have had from VM so far. As long as you are a VM broadband customer they can help you.
Thanks for posting the full error message. Sadly, error messages only quote the error they don't explain what checking the recipient has done in background to arrive at that error. The IP address of the VM mail servers do give a reverse DNS so why are groups.io reporting there is no reverse DNS?
I am wondering if the issue is not that there is no reverse DNS but groups.io do not like the DNS that it comes up with. As I said earlier some clarification from groups.io might be helpful.
Coenoby
I'm a Very Insightful Person, I'm here to share knowledge, I don't work for Virgin Media.
Have I helped? Click Mark as Helpful Answer or use Kudos to say thanks
on 16-09-2023 12:24
Let's see what happens. Thanks for commenting.
Cheers,
David
on 17-09-2023 13:07
@David-J-Taylor I've done my own reverse DNS lookup on each of the IP addresses in the original post
(base) timothydutton@Timothys-MacBook-Air ~ % dig +short -x 84.116.50.34
csmtpq3-prd-nl1-vmo.edge.unified.services.
(base) timothydutton@Timothys-MacBook-Air ~ % dig +short -x 84.116.50.35
csmtpq1-prd-nl1-vmo.edge.unified.services.
(base) timothydutton@Timothys-MacBook-Air ~ % dig +short -x 84.116.50.37
csmtpq2-prd-nl1-vmo.edge.unified.services.
(base) timothydutton@Timothys-MacBook-Air ~ % dig +short -x 84.116.50.41
csmtpq4-prd-nl1-vmo.edge.unified.services.
As you can see all four have a valid reverse DNS. I also sent a mail to check the point where it hits my mail servers
Received: from csmtpq4-prd-nl1-vmo.edge.unified.services (csmtpq4-prd-nl1-vmo.edge.unified.services [84.116.50.41])
The header tells me that my server also found a valid reverse DNS and that it matches the name provided by the mail server at the time of connection.
The problem looks to be on the receiving end, they need to work out why their DNS resolvers aren't finding a valid reverse lookup.
It's not the first time I've seen this, but the last time was in reverse where VM's DNS servers on the mail platform were doing the same thing with a a specific set of authoritative servers ran by a hosting company.
Tim
I'm a Very Insightful Person, I'm here to share knowledge, I don't work for Virgin Media. Learn more
Have I helped? Click Mark as Helpful Answer or use Kudos to say thanks
on 17-09-2023 13:56
Hi David-J-Taylor,
Thanks for your post and welcome back to the community.
Sincere apologies for any issues faced with your email, just so we can gain further clarification with the emails that you are sending, are they being sent by a 3rd party client or from MyVM?
Let us know,
on 17-09-2023 15:21
@Kain_W I'm going to answer on behalf of the affected customer here.
They're being sent from one of the Virgin Media email domains via Virgin Media's outbound mail servers
This is not a problem with the customers email setup, the IP addresses in the original post are the outbound mail servers from Virgin Media's email platform itself.
In the interests of fixing this for the customer the mail tea might want to reach out to the postmaster on the receiving side so that they can look into this issue. The receiving party might not be aware of the problem on their side.
Tim
I'm a Very Insightful Person, I'm here to share knowledge, I don't work for Virgin Media. Learn more
Have I helped? Click Mark as Helpful Answer or use Kudos to say thanks