on 17-08-2021 19:45
Hi - we are suffering with slow and intermittent connections, particularly noticeable on my works laptop (slow connections) and my wife's iPhone (drop-outs). Following on from other posts I've included the logs here. Grateful for any support.
Acquired Downstream Channel (Hz) | 330750000 | Locked |
Ranged Upstream Channel (Hz) | 60300014 | Locked |
Provisioning State | Online |
Answered! Go to Answer
on 19-08-2021 07:03
All hub data looks very good. Nothing worrying in the Network log, power levels are a touch high on the downstream but within accepted limits, SNR is excellent, upstream looks ship shape. Looks like a recent reboot given the low levels of pre-RS errors (themselves unimportant) and the only thing to worry about would be if you observe a build up of post-RS errors on the downstream, or T3 timeouts on the upstream, or the levels shown all went awry. But any problems of erratic connection usually show up in the network log. Post up a link to a shared BQM and we can take a look at that, but thus far the finger points at poor wifi (wireless) and sadly that's not unusual with VM's pound shop hubs.
Are the problems mainly/entirely on wifi connected devices? Is the wifi signal strong, weak or inconsistent? And jumping the gun a bit, would you be prepared to spend a modest sum (circa £100) if required to permanently improve wifi?
on 17-08-2021 19:46
Downstream bonded channels
Channel Frequency (Hz) Power (dBmV) SNR (dB) Modulation Channel ID
1 | 330750000 | 8.3 | 43 | 256 qam | 25 |
2 | 202750000 | 9 | 40 | 256 qam | 9 |
3 | 210750000 | 9 | 40 | 256 qam | 10 |
4 | 218750000 | 9 | 40 | 256 qam | 11 |
5 | 226750000 | 9 | 40 | 256 qam | 12 |
6 | 234750000 | 8.6 | 40 | 256 qam | 13 |
7 | 242750000 | 8.5 | 40 | 256 qam | 14 |
8 | 250750000 | 8.5 | 40 | 256 qam | 15 |
9 | 258750000 | 8.1 | 40 | 256 qam | 16 |
10 | 266750000 | 8 | 40 | 256 qam | 17 |
11 | 274750000 | 7.9 | 40 | 256 qam | 18 |
12 | 282750000 | 8.1 | 40 | 256 qam | 19 |
13 | 290750000 | 8 | 40 | 256 qam | 20 |
14 | 298750000 | 8.4 | 40 | 256 qam | 21 |
15 | 306750000 | 8.1 | 40 | 256 qam | 22 |
16 | 314750000 | 8.1 | 40 | 256 qam | 23 |
17 | 322750000 | 8.1 | 40 | 256 qam | 24 |
18 | 338750000 | 8.1 | 40 | 256 qam | 26 |
19 | 346750000 | 8.1 | 40 | 256 qam | 27 |
20 | 354750000 | 8 | 40 | 256 qam | 28 |
21 | 362750000 | 8 | 40 | 256 qam | 29 |
22 | 370750000 | 8.3 | 43 | 256 qam | 30 |
23 | 378750000 | 8.3 | 40 | 256 qam | 31 |
24 | 386750000 | 8 | 40 | 256 qam | 32 |
Downstream bonded channels
Channel Locked Status RxMER (dB) Pre RS Errors Post RS Errors
1 | Locked | 43.3 | 6 | 0 |
2 | Locked | 40.3 | 6 | 0 |
3 | Locked | 40.9 | 6 | 0 |
4 | Locked | 40.9 | 6 | 0 |
5 | Locked | 40.9 | 6 | 0 |
6 | Locked | 40.9 | 7 | 0 |
7 | Locked | 40.9 | 5 | 0 |
8 | Locked | 40.9 | 6 | 0 |
9 | Locked | 40.9 | 4 | 0 |
10 | Locked | 40.9 | 5 | 0 |
11 | Locked | 40.9 | 5 | 0 |
12 | Locked | 40.9 | 13 | 0 |
13 | Locked | 40.9 | 5 | 0 |
14 | Locked | 40.9 | 6 | 0 |
15 | Locked | 40.9 | 6 | 0 |
16 | Locked | 40.9 | 7 | 0 |
17 | Locked | 40.3 | 7 | 0 |
18 | Locked | 40.9 | 6 | 0 |
19 | Locked | 40.9 | 5 | 0 |
20 | Locked | 40.9 | 6 | 0 |
21 | Locked | 40.9 | 6 | 0 |
22 | Locked | 43.3 | 8 | 0 |
23 | Locked | 40.3 | 6 | 0 |
24 | Locked | 40.9 | 1 | 0 |
on 17-08-2021 19:47
1 | 60300014 | 40.8 | 5120 | 64 qam | 1 |
2 | 39400007 | 40.8 | 5120 | 64 qam | 4 |
3 | 46199988 | 40.8 | 5120 | 64 qam | 3 |
4 | 53700014 | 40.8 | 5120 | 64 qam | 2 |
1 | ATDMA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2 | ATDMA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
3 | ATDMA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
4 | ATDMA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
on 17-08-2021 19:48
17/08/2021 19:21:0 | notice | LAN login Success;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0; |
17/08/2021 19:19:35 | Warning! | LAN login FAILED : Incorrect Username / Password / ConnectionType;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0; |
17/08/2021 08:54:1 | critical | No Ranging Response received - T3 time-out;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0; |
16/08/2021 18:45:45 | notice | DHCP Renew - lease parameters tftp file-cmreg-vmdg505-bbt060+voc-b.cm modified;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0; |
16/08/2021 18:45:45 | Error | DHCP RENEW WARNING - Field invalid in response v4 option;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0; |
13/08/2021 18:17:56 | critical | No Ranging Response received - T3 time-out;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0; |
13/08/2021 14:47:35 | notice | DHCP Renew - lease parameters tftp file-cmreg-vmdg505-bbt060+voc-b.cm modified;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0; |
13/08/2021 14:47:35 | Error | DHCP RENEW WARNING - Field invalid in response v4 option;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0; |
11/08/2021 23:17:23 | critical | No Ranging Response received - T3 time-out;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0; |
11/08/2021 10:09:3 | notice | LAN login Success;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0; |
09/08/2021 11:49:14 | critical | No Ranging Response received - T3 time-out;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0; |
09/08/2021 11:11:33 | notice | LAN login Success;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0; |
09/08/2021 10:21:22 | critical | No Ranging Response received - T3 time-out;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0; |
09/08/2021 09:43:55 | notice | DHCP Renew - lease parameters tftp file-cmreg-vmdg505-bbt060+voc-b.cm modified;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0; |
09/08/2021 09:43:55 | Error | DHCP RENEW WARNING - Field invalid in response v4 option;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0; |
06/08/2021 14:26:51 | critical | No Ranging Response received - T3 time-out;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0; |
06/08/2021 11:46:56 | notice | LAN login Success;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0; |
06/08/2021 01:19:4 | critical | No Ranging Response received - T3 time-out;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0; |
05/08/2021 17:01:2 | notice | LAN login Success;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0; |
05/08/2021 06:15:15 | notice | DHCP Renew - lease parameters tftp file-cmreg-vmdg505-bbt060+voc-b.cm modified;CM-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CMTS-MAC=**:**:**:**:**:**;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0; |
on 19-08-2021 07:03
All hub data looks very good. Nothing worrying in the Network log, power levels are a touch high on the downstream but within accepted limits, SNR is excellent, upstream looks ship shape. Looks like a recent reboot given the low levels of pre-RS errors (themselves unimportant) and the only thing to worry about would be if you observe a build up of post-RS errors on the downstream, or T3 timeouts on the upstream, or the levels shown all went awry. But any problems of erratic connection usually show up in the network log. Post up a link to a shared BQM and we can take a look at that, but thus far the finger points at poor wifi (wireless) and sadly that's not unusual with VM's pound shop hubs.
Are the problems mainly/entirely on wifi connected devices? Is the wifi signal strong, weak or inconsistent? And jumping the gun a bit, would you be prepared to spend a modest sum (circa £100) if required to permanently improve wifi?
on 19-08-2021 07:25
I'm happy to spend money on a mesh system... We have 200mbps connection... Would the m4s be best?
Here's the link to the BQM and thanks again for your help.
https://www.thinkbroadband.com/broadband/monitoring/quality/share/6d97888074b2f25037e06b89446f3b9b33e40ff6
on 19-08-2021 07:31
on 19-08-2021 07:51
My thoughts on the TP-Link Deco M4:
Depending on price and availability a Deco S4 would be equally as good as the M4, avoid the Deco E4 as it is constrained for its external internet connection to 100 Mbps. The M5 and M9 are good, and nominally even higher performance than the M4, but they're more expensive and I doubt you'd see the difference on 200-350 Mbps connections.
Looking at the BQM there are some issues in that the latency is worse during peak hours, but close to the lowest perceivable level at which you can see a distinctive pattern. The "clean" trace from 12:30am to 8am suggests that the area network is fine when there's little traffic, it's worst afternoon and mid-evening, so I reckon that the VM network around you is just starting to creak under the current level of data traffic. If a few customers leave it will improve, if VM sign up more customers it will get worse. At the level implied here there won't be an over-utilisation fault recognised, so "it is what it is" and you have to form any decisions around that. Avoid any contract change for the next few months in case things start to deteriorate, because you wouldn't want a new 18 month lock if VM are signing up more and more customers and making the problem materially worse. If it proves tolerable and performance stable (or even improves) then by all means change the package, re-contract for a retention discount or whatever.
I'd expect from what you describe that a mesh system would resolve the vast majority of the problems you describe as these seem to be most likely the hub's weak wifi, but that you might still see the odd minor glitch in videocalls or gaming, although at the levels showing I'd hope those wouldn't be full on dropouts. But from somewhere with a good returns policy, and then you'll have at least a couple of weeks to see if a mesh system does what you want.
on 21-08-2021 09:44
Hi @SteveDisco,
Welcome to our Community Forums and thanks for posting.
I am sorry to hear you are having some issues with the service.
I have checked the account and everything looks good this end. Your signal levels are within the range we would expect and there's no area outages impacting you.
Since you don't have any wired connections and it appears to be a WiFi issue, we have some tips to help improve the wireless network signal and range here
on 21-08-2021 09:49
Hi @Ayisha_B
Thanks for the response... We've now set up the Deco M4 mesh following the guidance on this forum and so far they are working a dream... Great speeds upstairs now and even extended out to the garden.
Bit challenging with Sky Q boxes but now resolved.
Thanks for all the help from the contributors on here.