cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Hub 3 / Compal CH7465-LG (TG2492LG) and CGNV4 Latency Cause

Datalink
Up to speed

Good Day Ladies and Gentlemen,

Greetings from the other side of the pond, so to speak.  Over the last few weeks I've been perusing various user forums across North America and Europe for issues related to Intel Puma 6 modem latency.  Of those forums, your Hub 3 stands out as yet another Puma 6 based modem where users see continuous latency no matter what site is used or what online game is played. Considering all of the problems that are on the go, the following information should be of interest to all Hub 3, Compal CH7465-LG and Hitron CGNV4 modem users.  There is much more to post regarding this, so this is a start, to alert VM users as to the real cause of the latency and hopefully engage the VM engineering staff, via the forum staff, with Arris.  I am surprised to see that there has been no mention on this board of users from other ISPs who are suffering the exact same issues with their modems, so, this may come as a surprise to some, and possibly old news to others.

So, the short story ........

The Hub 3 / Compal CH7465-LG (TG2492LG) & Hiton CGNV4 modems are Intel Puma 6 / 6 Media Gateway (MG) based modems.  These modems exhibit high latency to the modem and high latency thru the modem.  The latency affects all IPV4 and IPV6 protocols, so it will be seen on every internet application and game.  The basic cause is the processing of the data packets thru a CPU software based process instead of thru the hardware processor / accelerator.  It appears that a higher priority task runs periodically, causing the packet processing to halt, and then resume.  This is observed as latency in applications and in ping tests to the modem and beyond.  For the last several weeks, Hitron, along with Intel and Rogers Communications in Canada have been addressing the latency issue within the Hitron CGNxxx series modems.  To date, only the IPV4 ICMP latency has been resolved.  Although this is only one protocol, it does show that a Puma 6MG modem is capable of using the hardware processor / accelerator with good results.  Currently Rogers is waiting for further firmware updates from Hitron which should include an expanded list of resolved protocol latency issues.  For Arris modems, "Netdog" an Arris engineer indicated last week that Arris was onboard to address the issue for the Arris SB6190 modem.  That should be considered as good news for any Arris modem (read Hub 3) user as Arris should be able to port those changes over to other Puma 6/6MG modems fairly quickly.  This is not a trivial exercise and will probably take several weeks to accomplish.  Note that there is no guarantee at this point that it is possible to shift all packet processing to the hardware processor / accelerator without suffering from any packet loss side effects.  Time will tell if all of the technical issues can be resolved with the current hardware included in the Puma 6/6MG chipset.  Last night, Netdog loaded beta firmware on selected test modems on the Comcast Communications network.  As this was only done last night, it's too soon to tell what this version resolves and if it was successful or not.  Netdog has contacts with staff at Comcast, Rogers, Charter and Cox Communications to fan out beta versions and modifications for testing.  I'd say its time to add Virgin Media and/or Liberty Global to that group as well.

Recent activity:

Approx three weeks ago a DSLReports user, xymox1 started a thread where he reported high latency to an Arris SB6190 and illustrated that with numerous MultiPing plots.  This is the same latency that I and other users with Rogers communications have been dealing with for months so it came as no surprise.  As well as reporting via that thread, xymox1 took it upon himself to email several staff members at Arris, Intel, Cablelabs and others.  The result of that campaign was Netdog's announcement, last week, that Arris was fully engaged at resolving the issue.  That has led to last nights release of beta firmware, although as I indicated its too early to determine what the beta firmware resolves, if anything.


The original thread that xymox1 started is here:

https://www.dslreports.com/forum/r31079834-ALL-SB6190-is-a-terrible-modem-Intel-Puma-6-MaxLinear-mis...


Yesterday, DSLReports issued a news story covering the thread:

https://www.dslreports.com/shownews/The-Arris-SB6190-Modem-Puma-6-Chipset-Have-Some-Major-Issues-138...


Today, Arris responded:

https://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Arris-Tells-us-Its-Working-With-Intel-on-SB6190-Puma6-Problems-1...


That response was also picked by Multichannel.com

http://www.multichannel.com/news/distribution/intel-arris-working-firmware-fix-sb6190-modem/409379

This is more news likely to appear in the next few days as additional tech and news staff pick up on this issue.


Hub 3 observations:

Like many others using a Puma 6/6MG modem, Hub 3 users are experiencing latency when they ping the modem, or ping a target outside of the home, game online or use low latency applications.  The common misconception is that this is Buffer Bloat. It's not. Its most likely a case of the packet processing stopping while the CPU processes a higher priority task.  The packet processing is done via the CPU no matter what mode the modem is operating in, modem mode or router mode and no matter what IPV4 or IPV6 protocol is used.  Normally, the latency is just that, latency.  The exception are UDP packets. In this case there is latency and packet loss.  The result of that is delayed and failed DNS lookups, and poor game performance for games that use UDP for player/server comms or player/player comms.


Can this be fixed?

So far, it appears that the answer is yes.  Rogers Communications issued beta firmware to a small group of test modems in October.  This version shifted the IPV4 ICMP processing from the CPU to the hardware processor / accelerator, resulting in greatly improved performance in ping latency.  At the present time we are waiting for the next version firmware which should shift other protocols over to the hardware processor / accelerator.  That can be seen in the following post:

http://communityforums.rogers.com/t5/forums/forumtopicpage/board-id/Getting_connected/message-id/369...

The details and results of last nights beta release to the Comcast group have yet to be seen.

At this point there is enough reading to keep most staff and users busy.  My intention is to post some of the history leading up to this point and instructions on how to detect the latency and packet loss.  This is not thru the use of a BQM.  I had hoped to post this all at once but events are moving much faster than I had thought they would.  For now this should suffice to get the ball rolling.

Below is a link to a post with a couple of HrPing plots from my 32 channel modem to the connected CMTS.  This shows the latency that is observed and reflects what others have posted in this forum using Pingplotter and HrPing.

https://www.dslreports.com/forum/r31106550-

HrPing is one of the freebie applications that can be used to monitor the latency to and thru the modem. 

Pingplots with Pingplotter which show the latency from my modem to the CMTS can be found in the first two to three rows of my online image library at Rogers Communications, located below.  They are essentially what the BQM would look like if you were able to zoom into the plot to the point where you could see the individual ping spikes.  Those ping spikes are common to Puma 6 and Puma 6MG modems.

http://communityforums.rogers.com/t5/media/gallerypage/user-id/829158

 

 

 [MOD EDIT: Subject heading changed to assist community]

4,478 REPLIES 4,478

1smallsausage
Joining in

For the past few days we have only been using the one XBone console now the weekends here my other son just booted his up so they can play GOW4 and they cant play together anymore or party chat we have tried on multiple titles with the same problem. The vm modem is in modem mode and the night hawk has all the ports forwarded which has always worked before .608FW was installed, both consoles have open nat and all hardware has been rebooted and reset multiple times and reconfigured and the problem still persists. Has anyone else tried more than one console since the new FW was installed ?


@1smallsausage wrote:

For the past few days we have only been using the one XBone console now the weekends here my other son just booted his up so they can play GOW4 and they cant play together anymore or party chat we have tried on multiple titles with the same problem. The vm modem is in modem mode and the night hawk has all the ports forwarded which has always worked before .608FW was installed, both consoles have open nat and all hardware has been rebooted and reset multiple times and reconfigured and the problem still persists. Has anyone else tried more than one console since the new FW was installed ?


I've had a few issues with messages and parties on XB1, but firmware 9.1.116V. Have you run the diagnostics on the xbox to see if there are any service related issues?

Returned from holidays a few days ago to find our SH3 had got the 9.1.116.608 firmware update.

Nothing else in our home network setup has changed and now our WiFi connections for both 2G and 5G direct from the SH3 crap out after a few minutes use. The only way we seem to be able to get reliable WiFi in the house is via one of the wireless homeplug extenders which sucks.

Within the last month we upgraded from 200MB (old SH2) to 350MB (new SH3) and whilst we have more bandwidth this firmware seems to have really hurt the SH3 WiFi ability - or at least for us.

Hi All

I've just tried a reset of the SH3 using a Pen and now the network log is advising the below , notice the SW File Corruption ?

 Current SH3 Version :  9.1.116BA3

Can anyone offer any advice?

 

Time
Priority
Description
2018-06-30 02:19:10.00
error
DHCP RENEW sent - No response for IPv4;CM-MAC=xx;CMTS-MAC=xx;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;
2018-06-30 05:08:09.00
warning
RCS Partial Service;CM-MAC=xx;CMTS-MAC=xx;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;
2018-06-30 15:36:26.00
error
DHCP RENEW sent - No response for IPv4;CM-MAC=xx;CMTS-MAC=xx;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;
2018-06-30 17:36:48.00
warning
RCS Partial Service;CM-MAC=xx;CMTS-MAC=xx;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;
2018-06-30 22:15:04.00
error
DHCP RENEW sent - No response for IPv4;CM-MAC=xx;CMTS-MAC=xx;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;
2018-06-30 23:24:55.00
warning
RCS Partial Service;CM-MAC=xx;CMTS-MAC=xx;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;
2018-07-01 01:34:23.00
error
DHCP RENEW sent - No response for IPv4;CM-MAC=xx;CMTS-MAC=xx;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;
2018-07-01 01:42:21.00
warning
RCS Partial Service;CM-MAC=xx;CMTS-MAC=xx;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;
2018-07-01 03:14:03.00
error
DHCP RENEW sent - No response for IPv4;CM-MAC=xx;CMTS-MAC=xx;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;
2018-07-01 04:30:16.00
warning
RCS Partial Service;CM-MAC=xx;CMTS-MAC=xx;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;
2018-07-01 04:41:16.00
error
DHCP RENEW sent - No response for IPv4;CM-MAC=xx;CMTS-MAC=xx;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;
2018-07-01 04:53:47.00
error
DHCP REBIND WARNING - Field invalid in response;CM-MAC=xx;CMTS-MAC=xx;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;
2018-07-01 04:53:47.00
notice
DHCP Renew - lease parameters tftp file-cmreg-vmdg505-rtsxl20016u-b.cm modified;CM-MAC=xx;CMTS-MAC=xx;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;
2018-07-01 05:16:47.00
warning
RCS Partial Service;CM-MAC=xx;CMTS-MAC=xx;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;
1970-01-01 00:01:23.00
error
Missing Mandatory MDD TLV on primary DS Channel;CM-MAC=xx;CMTS-MAC=xx;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;
1970-01-01 00:01:38.00
critical
No Ranging Response received - T3 time-out;CM-MAC=xx;CMTS-MAC=xx;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;
1970-01-01 00:02:03.00
error
Missing Mandatory MDD TLV on primary DS Channel;CM-MAC=xx;CMTS-MAC=xx;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;
1970-01-01 00:02:18.00
critical
No Ranging Response received - T3 time-out;CM-MAC=xx;CMTS-MAC=xx;CM-QOS=1.1;CM-VER=3.0;
2018-07-01 11:56:01.00
notice
SW Download INIT - Via Config file
2018-07-01 11:56:11.00
error
SW upgrade Failed after download - SW File corruption

Have you tried restarting it again?

________________________________________________________________

In HA7. Billing Area 21.
Utilisation Fault
F003502423: Review Dates -> 07/10/2015 -> 02/12/2015 -> 20/01/2016 😞 -> Closed 🙂
Utilisation Fault F004873444: Review Dates -> 29/03/2017 😞 -> Closed 🙂
Utilisation Fault F005506920: Review Dates -> 09/08/2017 -> 08/06/2018 -> 13/06/2018 -> 11/07/2018 -> 12/09/2018 -> 29/05/2019 😞 -> Open 😞


Pikeyp
On our wavelength

Sorry ... rubbish post ...


@1smallsausage wrote:

For the past few days we have only been using the one XBone console now the weekends here my other son just booted his up so they can play GOW4 and they cant play together anymore or party chat we have tried on multiple titles with the same problem. The vm modem is in modem mode and the night hawk has all the ports forwarded which has always worked before .608FW was installed, both consoles have open nat and all hardware has been rebooted and reset multiple times and reconfigured and the problem still persists. Has anyone else tried more than one console since the new FW was installed ?


Always used UPNP for our 2 PS4’s and as I understand it you can’t port forward to 2 devices, though you could try 3075 for the second.  From port forward site best advice is to have auto DHCP IP for both xboxes and turn on UPNP.   Maybe  check for latest firmware on the nighthawk if it’s UPNP is not great   ?

Pasbags
Dialled in

Just had the firmware update here in area 20 vivid 200

avro698
On our wavelength

Had the update overnight, area 25, moving from 9.1.116.BA3 to 9.1.116.608, vivid 200.

2018-07-01 23:56:58.00  notice  SW Download INIT - Via NMS
2018-07-01 23:59:08.00  notice  SW download Successful - Via NMS

BA3-608.png

.608 downloaded for me last night also ~0:30 this morning. Area 05.