cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Hub 3 / Compal CH7465-LG (TG2492LG) and CGNV4 Latency Cause

Datalink
Up to speed

Good Day Ladies and Gentlemen,

Greetings from the other side of the pond, so to speak.  Over the last few weeks I've been perusing various user forums across North America and Europe for issues related to Intel Puma 6 modem latency.  Of those forums, your Hub 3 stands out as yet another Puma 6 based modem where users see continuous latency no matter what site is used or what online game is played. Considering all of the problems that are on the go, the following information should be of interest to all Hub 3, Compal CH7465-LG and Hitron CGNV4 modem users.  There is much more to post regarding this, so this is a start, to alert VM users as to the real cause of the latency and hopefully engage the VM engineering staff, via the forum staff, with Arris.  I am surprised to see that there has been no mention on this board of users from other ISPs who are suffering the exact same issues with their modems, so, this may come as a surprise to some, and possibly old news to others.

So, the short story ........

The Hub 3 / Compal CH7465-LG (TG2492LG) & Hiton CGNV4 modems are Intel Puma 6 / 6 Media Gateway (MG) based modems.  These modems exhibit high latency to the modem and high latency thru the modem.  The latency affects all IPV4 and IPV6 protocols, so it will be seen on every internet application and game.  The basic cause is the processing of the data packets thru a CPU software based process instead of thru the hardware processor / accelerator.  It appears that a higher priority task runs periodically, causing the packet processing to halt, and then resume.  This is observed as latency in applications and in ping tests to the modem and beyond.  For the last several weeks, Hitron, along with Intel and Rogers Communications in Canada have been addressing the latency issue within the Hitron CGNxxx series modems.  To date, only the IPV4 ICMP latency has been resolved.  Although this is only one protocol, it does show that a Puma 6MG modem is capable of using the hardware processor / accelerator with good results.  Currently Rogers is waiting for further firmware updates from Hitron which should include an expanded list of resolved protocol latency issues.  For Arris modems, "Netdog" an Arris engineer indicated last week that Arris was onboard to address the issue for the Arris SB6190 modem.  That should be considered as good news for any Arris modem (read Hub 3) user as Arris should be able to port those changes over to other Puma 6/6MG modems fairly quickly.  This is not a trivial exercise and will probably take several weeks to accomplish.  Note that there is no guarantee at this point that it is possible to shift all packet processing to the hardware processor / accelerator without suffering from any packet loss side effects.  Time will tell if all of the technical issues can be resolved with the current hardware included in the Puma 6/6MG chipset.  Last night, Netdog loaded beta firmware on selected test modems on the Comcast Communications network.  As this was only done last night, it's too soon to tell what this version resolves and if it was successful or not.  Netdog has contacts with staff at Comcast, Rogers, Charter and Cox Communications to fan out beta versions and modifications for testing.  I'd say its time to add Virgin Media and/or Liberty Global to that group as well.

Recent activity:

Approx three weeks ago a DSLReports user, xymox1 started a thread where he reported high latency to an Arris SB6190 and illustrated that with numerous MultiPing plots.  This is the same latency that I and other users with Rogers communications have been dealing with for months so it came as no surprise.  As well as reporting via that thread, xymox1 took it upon himself to email several staff members at Arris, Intel, Cablelabs and others.  The result of that campaign was Netdog's announcement, last week, that Arris was fully engaged at resolving the issue.  That has led to last nights release of beta firmware, although as I indicated its too early to determine what the beta firmware resolves, if anything.


The original thread that xymox1 started is here:

https://www.dslreports.com/forum/r31079834-ALL-SB6190-is-a-terrible-modem-Intel-Puma-6-MaxLinear-mis...


Yesterday, DSLReports issued a news story covering the thread:

https://www.dslreports.com/shownews/The-Arris-SB6190-Modem-Puma-6-Chipset-Have-Some-Major-Issues-138...


Today, Arris responded:

https://www.dslreports.com/shownews/Arris-Tells-us-Its-Working-With-Intel-on-SB6190-Puma6-Problems-1...


That response was also picked by Multichannel.com

http://www.multichannel.com/news/distribution/intel-arris-working-firmware-fix-sb6190-modem/409379

This is more news likely to appear in the next few days as additional tech and news staff pick up on this issue.


Hub 3 observations:

Like many others using a Puma 6/6MG modem, Hub 3 users are experiencing latency when they ping the modem, or ping a target outside of the home, game online or use low latency applications.  The common misconception is that this is Buffer Bloat. It's not. Its most likely a case of the packet processing stopping while the CPU processes a higher priority task.  The packet processing is done via the CPU no matter what mode the modem is operating in, modem mode or router mode and no matter what IPV4 or IPV6 protocol is used.  Normally, the latency is just that, latency.  The exception are UDP packets. In this case there is latency and packet loss.  The result of that is delayed and failed DNS lookups, and poor game performance for games that use UDP for player/server comms or player/player comms.


Can this be fixed?

So far, it appears that the answer is yes.  Rogers Communications issued beta firmware to a small group of test modems in October.  This version shifted the IPV4 ICMP processing from the CPU to the hardware processor / accelerator, resulting in greatly improved performance in ping latency.  At the present time we are waiting for the next version firmware which should shift other protocols over to the hardware processor / accelerator.  That can be seen in the following post:

http://communityforums.rogers.com/t5/forums/forumtopicpage/board-id/Getting_connected/message-id/369...

The details and results of last nights beta release to the Comcast group have yet to be seen.

At this point there is enough reading to keep most staff and users busy.  My intention is to post some of the history leading up to this point and instructions on how to detect the latency and packet loss.  This is not thru the use of a BQM.  I had hoped to post this all at once but events are moving much faster than I had thought they would.  For now this should suffice to get the ball rolling.

Below is a link to a post with a couple of HrPing plots from my 32 channel modem to the connected CMTS.  This shows the latency that is observed and reflects what others have posted in this forum using Pingplotter and HrPing.

https://www.dslreports.com/forum/r31106550-

HrPing is one of the freebie applications that can be used to monitor the latency to and thru the modem. 

Pingplots with Pingplotter which show the latency from my modem to the CMTS can be found in the first two to three rows of my online image library at Rogers Communications, located below.  They are essentially what the BQM would look like if you were able to zoom into the plot to the point where you could see the individual ping spikes.  Those ping spikes are common to Puma 6 and Puma 6MG modems.

http://communityforums.rogers.com/t5/media/gallerypage/user-id/829158

 

 

 [MOD EDIT: Subject heading changed to assist community]

4,478 REPLIES 4,478

Adduxi
Very Insightful Person
Very Insightful Person

..

I'm a Very Insightful Person, I'm here to share knowledge, I don't work for Virgin Media. Learn more

Have I helped? Click Mark as Helpful Answer or use Kudos to say thanks

I’ve switched from the Hub3 to the Hub2ac, I have the Hub3 in storage, I’d like to be apart of the trial.


@TrialsTeam wrote:

Hi

We have applied the test firmware to a small number of hubs, and when trials are completed will carry out national updates.

If you have any queries regarding this - please send us a private message..

Best wishes,

Community Trials Team


 

This firmware looks to be the version which only rectifies the ICMP (Ping) and DNS lookup issues which is a known firmware already released across the pond in an attempt to silence users complaining of ICMP latency.

Doesn't appear to resolve the UDP/TCP latency problems or easy DOS wipeout capability, do you guys have an ETA from Intel when this firmware will be available to rectify those issues.

This firmware won't silence people who are still having problems, all this will do is give people prettier ICMP graphs and confuse users to believe nothing is wrong anymore.  Most people haven't a clue how to check the latency of TCP/UDP packets and most aren't willing to go and find out how.

I can see why this was done, it was to reduce the heat being generated against the support team with people asking for SH2AC units and wanting to cancel their packages.  I have the 300M package and the SH3 is sat in a box until this issue is fixed as I have refused to even activate it.

Anonymous
Not applicable

As I understand it there is no resolution to this possible in firmware while preserving throughput.

People asking when Intel are going to be fixing this are likely doomed to disappointment - there isn't a fix only workarounds that leave the modems unable to process packets at an acceptable rate.

wotusaw
Superfast

I got the new update 9.1.116BA3 but unfortunately rebooted my modem before reading the message the trials team sent me. 

I reboot daily because it does seem to help the latency a bit for a short while.

So presume I've lost the update even though 9.1.116BA3 is still showing on the modem list..Smiley Mad

I have to laugh Smiley Very Happy...been waiting soooo long and kinda shot myself in the foot.

However before rebooting at 4pm... must have had it from 8am. The Broadband widget didn't show any difference at all between 8am and 4pm.

 

AndyN131
On our wavelength
I’ve got the update but haven’t had a message. What does the message say and where would I find it?!


@wotusaw wrote:

I got the new update 9.1.116BA3 but unfortunately rebooted my modem before reading the message the trials team sent me. 

I reboot daily because it does seem to help the latency a bit for a short while.

So presume I've lost the update even though 9.1.116BA3 is still showing on the modem list..Smiley Mad

I have to laugh Smiley Very Happy...been waiting soooo long and kinda shot myself in the foot.

However before rebooting at 4pm... must have had it from 8am. The Broadband widget didn't show any difference at all between 8am and 4pm.

 


Why presume you've lost it? If the modem states it's that version, it's that version. 

 

A reboot (shouldn't) revert back to an older firmware unless VM have rolled it back for some reason.

Anonymous
Not applicable

Message i got if you do a reset of hub you will lose it

wotusaw
Superfast

Thanks. Presume....yes possibly a mistake.

I presumed because the Broadband widget showed no difference whatsoever, unlike the others I've seen here.

I started a new monitor just now so will see what that comes up with.

I did the DSL packet test as well and that also showed no difference.

Honestly think I've lost it by rebooting for the reasons above. Despite the 9.1.116BA3 still showing at present.

To be clear, didn't 'reset' but rebooted by turning off at the plug. However thought reset and reboot are the same.

 

If you would like to remove this firmware and go back to the latest general release, just reset your Hub using the pinhole reset function.

Unless you've done a pinhole reset you won't have lost it.